Compugraphics International Ltd v. Nikolik [2011] ScotCS CSIH_34 (20 May 2011)
Scots law recognises servitudes of projection and support in appropriate circumstances. The 1983 Feu Disposition is a clear bounding title, granting ownership of the factory and its fixtures (pipes and ductwork) to the pursuers, but not the solum of the pathway or embedded stanchions. Servitude rights of projection and support may be constituted by prescription if the requisite facts are established. An inquiry into the facts is necessary to determine degrees of severability, attachment, and prescriptive possession.
- Citation
- [2011] ScotCS CSIH_34
- Parties
- Pursuer and Respondent: Compugraphics International Limited; Defender and Reclaimer: Colin Nikolic
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Reclaiming Motion and Cross Appeal From Outer House Interlocutor
- Outcome
- Reclaiming motion allowed; cross-appeal refused; Lord Ordinary's interlocutor recalled; proof before answer ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Ownership of Fixtures, Servitude of Projection, Servitude of Support, Prescription, Bounding Title, Parts and Pertinents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Compugraphics International Limited
Pursuer and Respondent
Colin Nikolic
Defender and Reclaimer
Procedural Posture
Civil / Reclaiming Motion and Cross Appeal From Outer House Interlocutor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether pursuers own pipes, ductwork, and stanchions overhanging defender's land
- 2 Whether servitude rights of projection and support exist in Scots law
- 3 Whether prescription has constituted servitude rights
Ratio Decidendi
Scots law recognises servitudes of projection and support in appropriate circumstances. The 1983 Feu Disposition is a clear bounding title, granting ownership of the factory and its fixtures (pipes and ductwork) to the pursuers, but not the solum of the pathway or embedded stanchions. Servitude rights of projection and support may be constituted by prescription if the requisite facts are established. An inquiry into the facts is necessary to determine degrees of severability, attachment, and prescriptive possession.
Court Disposition
Reclaiming motion allowed; cross-appeal refused; Lord Ordinary's interlocutor recalled; proof before answer ordered.
Orders
- Case put out By Order before the bench to discuss expenses, further procedure, and questions of amendment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment