AA AGAINST BB [2015] ScotSC 36 (11 May 2015)
The appeal was allowed because the sheriff erred in depriving the defender of all parental rights and responsibilities; instead, suspension of these rights and responsibilities was ordered, with supervised contact to be determined by the sheriff. The best interests of the child require suspension rather than deprivation, allowing for future review and supervised contact.
- Citation
- [2015] ScotSC 36
- Parties
- Pursuer and Respondent: AA; Defender and Appellant: BB
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Note of Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sheriff's interlocutor recalled; parental rights and responsibilities suspended, not deprived.
- Legal Topics
- Parental Rights and Responsibilities, Contact Orders, Suspension of Parental Rights, Best Interests of the Child
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AA
Pursuer and Respondent
BB
Defender and Appellant
Procedural Posture
Note of Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sheriff erred in depriving the defender of all parental rights and responsibilities
- 2 Whether a contact order should be made in favour of the defender
- 3 Appropriate legal test for deprivation or suspension of parental rights and responsibilities
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was allowed because the sheriff erred in depriving the defender of all parental rights and responsibilities; instead, suspension of these rights and responsibilities was ordered, with supervised contact to be determined by the sheriff. The best interests of the child require suspension rather than deprivation, allowing for future review and supervised contact.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sheriff's interlocutor recalled; parental rights and responsibilities suspended, not deprived.
Orders
- Sheriff's findings in fact amended as specified.
- Sheriff's findings in fact and law deleted and substituted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment