Nairn and Others v. The University Courts of St Andrews and Edinburgh and Others [1907] ScotLR 122 (16 November 1907)
Women graduates, though admitted to the register of the General Council by virtue of university ordinances, are not entitled to vote in Parliamentary elections for university constituencies because the relevant statutes, properly construed in light of constitutional principles and legislative history, do not extend the franchise to women. The registrar is not obliged to issue voting papers to persons not legally entitled to vote.
- Citation
- [1907] ScotLR 122
- Parties
- Pursuers (applicants): Margaret Nairn and others; Defenders (respondents): The University Courts of St Andrews and Edinburgh and others
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 1907
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action (declarator and Payment) / Appeal (reclaiming Note) From Lord Ordinary's Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; judgment for defenders affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Parliamentary Franchise, University Elections, Women's Suffrage, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Margaret Nairn and others
Pursuers (applicants)
The University Courts of St Andrews and Edinburgh and others
Defenders (respondents)
Procedural Posture
Civil Action (declarator and Payment) / Appeal (reclaiming Note) From Lord Ordinary's Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether women graduates are entitled to vote in Parliamentary elections for university constituencies under the relevant statutes
- 2 Whether the registrar is obliged to issue voting papers to women graduates on the register
Ratio Decidendi
Women graduates, though admitted to the register of the General Council by virtue of university ordinances, are not entitled to vote in Parliamentary elections for university constituencies because the relevant statutes, properly construed in light of constitutional principles and legislative history, do not extend the franchise to women. The registrar is not obliged to issue voting papers to persons not legally entitled to vote.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; judgment for defenders affirmed.
Orders
- Reclaiming note refused; Lord Ordinary's judgment adhered to; pursuers not entitled to vote or to receive voting papers; no payment due from registrar.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment