Gillespie v Gillespie & Ors [2011] ScotCS CSOH_201 (30 November 2011)
The option agreement to purchase Ford Farm was acquired as part of a partnership development proposal and is therefore a partnership asset held by Mr Graham Gillespie on behalf of the partnership.
- Citation
- [2011] ScotCS CSOH_201
- Parties
- Pursuer: James Stevenson Gillespie; Defender: Thomas Graham Gillespie; Defender: Allan Wilkinson Stanfield Gillespie; Defender: The Partnership of Thomas Graham Gillespie, Alan Wilkinson Stanfield Gillespie, James Stevenson Gillespie and Gary Stanfield Gillespie
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action (declarator) / Supplementary Opinion Following Earlier Judgment
- Outcome
- Declarator granted
- Legal Topics
- Partnership Assets, Option Agreements, Development Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Stevenson Gillespie
Pursuer
Thomas Graham Gillespie
Defender
Allan Wilkinson Stanfield Gillespie
Defender
The Partnership of Thomas Graham Gillespie, Alan Wilkinson Stanfield Gillespie, James Stevenson Gillespie and Gary Stanfield Gillespie
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil Action (declarator) / Supplementary Opinion Following Earlier Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the option agreement to purchase Ford Farm is a partnership asset
- 2 Whether the partnership has an interest in the option agreement
Ratio Decidendi
The option agreement to purchase Ford Farm was acquired as part of a partnership development proposal and is therefore a partnership asset held by Mr Graham Gillespie on behalf of the partnership.
Court Disposition
Declarator granted
Orders
- Declared that the option agreement to purchase Ford Farm is a partnership asset held by Mr Graham Gillespie on behalf of the partnership
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment