Low & Bonar Plc & Anor v. Mercer Ltd [2010] ScotCS CSOH_47 (01 April 2010)
The board minute of 5 March 1991, signed by the chairman, constituted a 'deed' for the purposes of clause 4(1) of the 1989 Supplemental Definitive Deed under Scots law, being a formal document evidencing a clear intention to amend the scheme. With the Trustees' written consent on 5 July 1991, the scheme was validly amended to equalize the normal retirement date for men and women at 65 from 1 July 1991. The pursuers' claim that the scheme was not effectively amended until 2002 is therefore unfounded, and the action is dismissed.
- Citation
- [2010] ScotCS CSOH_47
- Parties
- Pursuer: Low & Bonar Plc; Pursuer: Low & Bonar Pension Trustees Limited; Defender: Mercer Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Outer House, Court of Session – Opinion on Relevancy and Dismissal
- Outcome
- Action dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Pension Scheme Amendment, Equalization of Retirement Ages, Interpretation of Trust Deeds, Professional Negligence, Breach of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Low & Bonar Plc
Pursuer
Low & Bonar Pension Trustees Limited
Pursuer
Mercer Limited
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Outer House, Court of Session – Opinion on Relevancy and Dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the normal retirement date (NRD) under the Low & Bonar Group Retirement Benefits Scheme was effectively equalized at age 65 prior to 2002
- 2 Whether the board minute of 5 March 1991 constituted a 'deed' sufficient to amend the scheme under clause 4 of the 1989 Supplemental Definitive Deed
- 3 Whether, alternatively, Rule 16(B) permitted the alteration of NRDs for members by special terms
Ratio Decidendi
The board minute of 5 March 1991, signed by the chairman, constituted a 'deed' for the purposes of clause 4(1) of the 1989 Supplemental Definitive Deed under Scots law, being a formal document evidencing a clear intention to amend the scheme. With the Trustees' written consent on 5 July 1991, the scheme was validly amended to equalize the normal retirement date for men and women at 65 from 1 July 1991. The pursuers' claim that the scheme was not effectively amended until 2002 is therefore unfounded, and the action is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Action dismissed
Orders
- Action dismissed as irrelevant; no proof allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment