IN PETITION OF DUMFRIES AND GALLOWAY COUNCIL FOR A PERMANENCE ORDER IN TERMS OF SECTION 80 OF THE ADOPTION AND CHILDREN SCOTLAND ACT 2007 IN RELATION [2012] ScotSC 79 (17 July 2012)
A motion for an interim order for contact in a permanence application at the instance of parents who have not been deprived of parental responsibility and right to maintain contact is competent. The court's discretion to grant such a motion is wide and not restricted to the local authority. The interests of the child, including expeditious determination of the application and the provision of information to the court, justify granting the motion for supervised contact to allow expert observation.
- Citation
- [2012] ScotSC 79
- Parties
- Petitioner: Dumfries and Galloway Council; Father/respondent: McMurchie; Mother/respondent: Hann
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Petition for Permanence Order / Interim Motion for Contact Pending Proof
- Outcome
- Interim order for supervised contact granted
- Legal Topics
- Permanence Orders, Interim Contact, Adoption, Supervision Requirements, Parental Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dumfries and Galloway Council
Petitioner
McMurchie
Father/respondent
Hann
Mother/respondent
Procedural Posture
Petition for Permanence Order / Interim Motion for Contact Pending Proof
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an interim order for contact can be made at the instance of parents in a permanence order application under section 97(2) of the Adoption and Children (Scotland) Act 2007
- 2 Whether the court's discretion to make interim orders is limited to applications by the local authority
- 3 Whether the best interests of the child require the granting of interim contact for the purpose of expert observation
Ratio Decidendi
A motion for an interim order for contact in a permanence application at the instance of parents who have not been deprived of parental responsibility and right to maintain contact is competent. The court's discretion to grant such a motion is wide and not restricted to the local authority. The interests of the child, including expeditious determination of the application and the provision of information to the court, justify granting the motion for supervised contact to allow expert observation.
Court Disposition
Interim order for supervised contact granted
Orders
- The child R shall have contact with his parents together for one hour at such time before 16 August 2012 as arranged by the petitioners; contact to be supervised as previously and observed by Dr Richard Woolfson, Chartered Psychologist.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment