THE CITY OF EDINBURGH COUNCIL FOR PERMANENCE ORDERS IN RESPECT OF THE CHILDREN AB AND CD v. WX AND YZ [2014] ScotSC 38 (28 May 2014)
The court was not satisfied that residence of the children with their mother is likely to be seriously detrimental to their welfare. The mother's past issues, including drug abuse and chaotic lifestyle, have been addressed and she is now stable, drug-free, and has demonstrated good parenting. The historical concerns do not justify extinguishing her parental rights. Therefore, the statutory test for a permanence order is not met.
- Citation
- [2014] ScotSC 38
- Parties
- Petitioner: The City of Edinburgh Council; Child: AB; Child: CD; First Respondent (mother): WX; Second Respondent (father): YZ
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Petition for Permanence Orders (child Welfare) / Judgment After Proof (trial)
- Outcome
- Petition for permanence orders refused.
- Legal Topics
- Permanence Orders, Parental Rights and Responsibilities, Child Protection, Adoption and Children (scotland) Act 2007, Children (scotland) Act 1995
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The City of Edinburgh Council
Petitioner
AB
Child
CD
Child
WX
First Respondent (mother)
YZ
Second Respondent (father)
Procedural Posture
Petition for Permanence Orders (child Welfare) / Judgment After Proof (trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether residence of the children with their mother is likely to be seriously detrimental to their welfare under the Adoption and Children (Scotland) Act 2007
- 2 Whether a permanence order should be granted extinguishing parental rights and responsibilities
Ratio Decidendi
The court was not satisfied that residence of the children with their mother is likely to be seriously detrimental to their welfare. The mother's past issues, including drug abuse and chaotic lifestyle, have been addressed and she is now stable, drug-free, and has demonstrated good parenting. The historical concerns do not justify extinguishing her parental rights. Therefore, the statutory test for a permanence order is not met.
Court Disposition
Petition for permanence orders refused.
Orders
- Refuses the Petitioner's application for a permanence order in relation to the children AB and CD.
- Appoints a hearing on a date to be afterwards fixed for the Sheriff to be addressed on the question of expenses.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment