APPLICATIONS FOR PERMANENCE ORDERS UNDER SECTION 80 OF THE ADOPTION AND CHILDREN (SCOTLAND) ACT 2007 IN RESPECT OF THE CHILDREN A AND B [2017] ScotSC 30 (19 May 2017)
The welfare of the children is safeguarded and promoted by the making of permanence orders with provision for indirect contact, including the annual viewing of photographs by the respondents, as this arrangement is appropriate and in the best interests of the children. The risks associated with viewing photographs do not materially increase existing risks, and the arrangement enhances the quality of indirect contact without compromising the children's welfare.
- Citation
- [2017] ScotSC 30
- Parties
- Petitioner: City of Edinburgh Council; Respondent (mother): M; Respondent (father): F; Child: A; Child: B
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Permanence Orders / Judgment After Proof
- Outcome
- Permanence orders granted with provision for indirect contact and cessation of compulsory supervision order.
- Legal Topics
- Permanence Orders, Parental Rights and Responsibilities, Contact Arrangements, Adoption and Children (scotland) Act 2007
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
City of Edinburgh Council
Petitioner
M
Respondent (mother)
F
Respondent (father)
A
Child
B
Child
Procedural Posture
Application for Permanence Orders / Judgment After Proof
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permanence orders should be granted under section 80 of the Adoption and Children (Scotland) Act 2007 in respect of children A and B
- 2 Whether indirect contact, including the viewing of photographs, is appropriate and in the best interests of the children
Ratio Decidendi
The welfare of the children is safeguarded and promoted by the making of permanence orders with provision for indirect contact, including the annual viewing of photographs by the respondents, as this arrangement is appropriate and in the best interests of the children. The risks associated with viewing photographs do not materially increase existing risks, and the arrangement enhances the quality of indirect contact without compromising the children's welfare.
Court Disposition
Permanence orders granted with provision for indirect contact and cessation of compulsory supervision order.
Orders
- Permanence orders made in favour of the petitioner in respect of each child, vesting parental responsibilities and rights as specified in sections 81 and 82 of the 2007 Act and the Children (Scotland) Act 1995.
- Provision for indirect contact three times per year, including exchange of cards or letters and annual viewing of photographs by the respondents, facilitated and monitored by the petitioner.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment