Glasgow City Council against MM (Sheriff Appeal Court Civil) [2024] SACCIV 38 (12 August 2024)
Section 81(1) of the Adoption and Children (Scotland) Act 2007 is not severable; both the responsibility to provide guidance and the right to regulate residence must vest in the local authority for a competent permanence order. Where the child is over 16 and the right to regulate residence cannot vest, a permanence order cannot competently be made. The sheriff erred in granting a permanence order in these circumstances.
- Citation
- [2024] SACCIV 38
- Parties
- Petitioner and Respondent: Glasgow City Council; Respondent and Appellant: MM
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 12 August 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil, Child Law) / Sheriff Appeal Court Decision on Appeal From Sheriff's Order Granting Permanence Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sheriff's interlocutor of 4 January 2024 recalled; petition refused; no expenses awarded; appeal sanctioned for junior counsel.
- Legal Topics
- Permanence Orders, Adoption and Children (scotland) Act 2007, Parental Rights and Responsibilities, Competency of Orders, Statutory Construction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Glasgow City Council
Petitioner and Respondent
MM
Respondent and Appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil, Child Law) / Sheriff Appeal Court Decision on Appeal From Sheriff's Order Granting Permanence Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 81(1) of the Adoption and Children (Scotland) Act 2007 is severable such that a permanence order can be made in respect of a child over 16 years old, vesting only the responsibility in section 81(1)(a) and not the right in section 81(1)(b)
- 2 Whether the sheriff erred in granting a permanence order where the right to regulate the child's residence could not vest due to the child's age
- 3 Whether the appeal was competent given the procedural history
Ratio Decidendi
Section 81(1) of the Adoption and Children (Scotland) Act 2007 is not severable; both the responsibility to provide guidance and the right to regulate residence must vest in the local authority for a competent permanence order. Where the child is over 16 and the right to regulate residence cannot vest, a permanence order cannot competently be made. The sheriff erred in granting a permanence order in these circumstances.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sheriff's interlocutor of 4 January 2024 recalled; petition refused; no expenses awarded; appeal sanctioned for junior counsel.
Orders
- Recall of sheriff's interlocutor of 4 January 2024
- Refusal of the petition for permanence order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment