Lloyds Pharmacy Ltd v. The National Appeal Panel & Anor [2004] ScotCS 140 (11 June 2004)

Lloyds Pharmacy Ltd v. The National Appeal Panel & Anor [2004] ScotCS 140 (11 June 2004)

The National Appeal Panel correctly applied regulation 5(10) by determining that existing pharmaceutical services in Stranraer were adequate, including consideration of future adequacy, and therefore was not required to consider whether the applicant's relocation was necessary or desirable. The Lord Ordinary's decision was erroneous in requiring a composite question beyond adequacy.

Citation
[2004] ScotCS 140
Parties
Petitioner: Lloyds Pharmacy Limited; First Respondent: The National Appeal Panel; Second Respondent: E. A. Baird (N'Ards) Limited
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
11 June 2004
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (reclaiming Motion) / Appeal From Lord Ordinary's Decision
Outcome
Reclaiming motion allowed; pleas-in-law for National Appeal Panel sustained; pleas-in-law for petitioners repelled; prayer of petition refused.
Legal Topics
Pharmaceutical Services, Statutory Interpretation, Adequacy of Service Provision, Judicial Review
Administrative Law Health Law Pharmaceutical Services Statutory Interpretation Adequacy of Service Provision Judicial Review

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lloyds Pharmacy Limited

Petitioner

The National Appeal Panel

First Respondent

E. A. Baird (N'Ards) Limited

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review (reclaiming Motion) / Appeal From Lord Ordinary's Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Proper construction and application of regulation 5(10) of the National Health Service (Pharmaceutical Services) (Scotland) Regulations 1995
  2. 2 Whether the National Appeal Panel misdirected itself in law regarding adequacy and necessity/desirability tests

Ratio Decidendi

The National Appeal Panel correctly applied regulation 5(10) by determining that existing pharmaceutical services in Stranraer were adequate, including consideration of future adequacy, and therefore was not required to consider whether the applicant's relocation was necessary or desirable. The Lord Ordinary's decision was erroneous in requiring a composite question beyond adequacy.

Court Disposition

Reclaiming motion allowed; pleas-in-law for National Appeal Panel sustained; pleas-in-law for petitioners repelled; prayer of petition refused.

Orders

  • Refusal of Lloyds Pharmacy Limited's application for judicial review
  • Sustainment of National Appeal Panel's pleas-in-law