Phillips v Strathclyde Joint Police Board For Judicial Review [2001] ScotCS 208 (17 August 2001)
The medical referee misdirected himself by treating the 'ordinariness' of police experiences as determinative; the correct test is whether the disablement was substantially caused by experiences in the execution of duty, regardless of whether those experiences were ordinary or extraordinary for a policeman.
- Citation
- [2001] ScotCS 208
- Parties
- Petitioner: Peter Phillips; Respondents: Strathclyde Joint Police Board
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 17 August 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Opinion of Outer House, Court of Session
- Outcome
- Petitioner's application partially granted; decree of reduction of Dr. Crawford's determination; case remitted for reconsideration.
- Legal Topics
- Police Pensions, Injury Awards, Causation in Disability, Judicial Review of Medical Determinations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Phillips
Petitioner
Strathclyde Joint Police Board
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Opinion of Outer House, Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioner's disablement was caused by an injury received in the execution of duty as a police constable under the Police Pensions Regulations 1987
- 2 Whether the medical referee applied the correct legal test for causation under the Regulations
Ratio Decidendi
The medical referee misdirected himself by treating the 'ordinariness' of police experiences as determinative; the correct test is whether the disablement was substantially caused by experiences in the execution of duty, regardless of whether those experiences were ordinary or extraordinary for a policeman.
Court Disposition
Petitioner's application partially granted; decree of reduction of Dr. Crawford's determination; case remitted for reconsideration.
Orders
- Decree of reduction of Dr. Crawford's determination dated 15 September 2000
- Remit to Dr. Crawford for reconsideration and determination in accordance with the legal views expressed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment