Church Commissioners For England & Ors v Scor UK Company Ltd & Ors [1998] ScotCS 5 (20 May 1998)
On a sound construction of the policy, the 'deductible amount' operates as an excess, meaning the first £1,000,000 (as adjusted) of each and every claim is to be borne by the insured, and the insurers are only liable for the amount exceeding that sum. The policy does not provide for indemnity of the whole loss once the deductible is exceeded. The counterclaim for rectification is refused by consent.
- Citation
- [1998] ScotCS 5
- Parties
- Pursuers: Church Commissioners for England and Others; Defenders: SCOR UK Company Limited and Others
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Insurance Contract Dispute / Preliminary Proof on Construction of Policy and Rectification Counterclaim
- Outcome
- Declarator granted in favour of defenders' construction; counterclaim for rectification refused by consent.
- Legal Topics
- Policy Interpretation, Deductible/excess Clauses, Rectification, Commercial Insurance, Contra Proferentem
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Church Commissioners for England and Others
Pursuers
SCOR UK Company Limited and Others
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Commercial Insurance Contract Dispute / Preliminary Proof on Construction of Policy and Rectification Counterclaim
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper construction of 'deductible amount' in insurance policy
- 2 Whether indemnity is for whole loss or only for amount exceeding deductible
- 3 Admissibility and relevance of extrinsic evidence in contract interpretation
Ratio Decidendi
On a sound construction of the policy, the 'deductible amount' operates as an excess, meaning the first £1,000,000 (as adjusted) of each and every claim is to be borne by the insured, and the insurers are only liable for the amount exceeding that sum. The policy does not provide for indemnity of the whole loss once the deductible is exceeded. The counterclaim for rectification is refused by consent.
Court Disposition
Declarator granted in favour of defenders' construction; counterclaim for rectification refused by consent.
Orders
- On a sound construction of the policy, the first £1,000,000 (as adjusted) of each and every claim constitutes an excess and is to be borne by the pursuers.
- Counterclaim for rectification refused by consent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment