Aberdeen College v. Youngson & Anor [2005] ScotCS CSOH_31 (25 February 2005)
A disposition granted by a disponer in favour of himself, with no change in legal persona, interest, or third party involvement, is invalid ex facie and cannot constitute a valid foundation writ for positive prescription under section 1(1) of the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973.
- Citation
- [2005] ScotCS CSOH_31
- Parties
- Pursuer: The Board of Management of Aberdeen College; Defender: Stewart Watt Youngson and Another
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Procedure Roll (pleas in Law)
- Outcome
- Pursuers' second and fourth pleas-in-law sustained; decree of reduction granted in terms of the third Conclusion.
- Legal Topics
- Positive Prescription, Invalidity of Dispositions, Self Dealing, Title to Land
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Board of Management of Aberdeen College
Pursuer
Stewart Watt Youngson and Another
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Procedure Roll (pleas in Law)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a disposition granted by a disponer in favour of himself can be a valid foundation writ for positive prescription under section 1(1) of the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973.
- 2 Whether such a disposition is invalid ex facie and insufficient to constitute title.
Ratio Decidendi
A disposition granted by a disponer in favour of himself, with no change in legal persona, interest, or third party involvement, is invalid ex facie and cannot constitute a valid foundation writ for positive prescription under section 1(1) of the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973.
Court Disposition
Pursuers' second and fourth pleas-in-law sustained; decree of reduction granted in terms of the third Conclusion.
Orders
- Reduction of the a non domino disposition dated 2 July 1993 and recorded 23 July 1993.
- Reduction of the docquets dated October 1999 and February and March 2000 in favour of the defenders.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment