Carmarthen Developments Ltd v Pennington [2008] ScotCS CSOH_139 (24 September 2008)
The postal acceptance rule does not apply to the intimation of purification or waiver of suspensive conditions in the contracts. Service of notice under the contracts required actual receipt by the defender or his solicitors. The pursuers' notices were served when the defender's solicitor collected the mail bag from the Post Office at 8.50am on Monday, before the defender's withdrawal could take effect at 9am. Therefore, the contracts were made unconditional before the defender's purported withdrawal.
- Citation
- [2008] ScotCS CSOH_139
- Parties
- Pursuer: Carmarthen Developments Limited; Defender: Samuel James Pennington
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 24 September 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (contract Dispute) / First Instance Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the pursuer
- Legal Topics
- Postal Acceptance Rule, Service of Notice, Conditional Contracts, Waiver and Purification of Suspensive Conditions, Interpretation of Notice Provisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Carmarthen Developments Limited
Pursuer
Samuel James Pennington
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil (contract Dispute) / First Instance Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the postal acceptance rule apply to the intimation of purification or waiver of suspensive conditions in a contract?
- 2 When is service of notice effected under the contract's notice provisions?
- 3 Did the pursuers timeously intimate purification of the suspensive conditions before the defender's withdrawal took effect?
Ratio Decidendi
The postal acceptance rule does not apply to the intimation of purification or waiver of suspensive conditions in the contracts. Service of notice under the contracts required actual receipt by the defender or his solicitors. The pursuers' notices were served when the defender's solicitor collected the mail bag from the Post Office at 8.50am on Monday, before the defender's withdrawal could take effect at 9am. Therefore, the contracts were made unconditional before the defender's purported withdrawal.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the pursuer
Orders
- Sustain the first and second pleas in law for the pursuers
- Repel the first plea in law for the defender
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment