Crum Ewing's Trustees v. Bayly's Trustees and Others [1910] ScotLR 423 (28 January 1910)
Mrs Bayly's exercise of the power of appointment was invalid; her will did not expressly or impliedly require her children to elect between taking under her will and claiming under their grandfather's will. The estates were separable, and no massing or condition of election was imposed regarding the grandfather's estate.
- Citation
- [1910] ScotLR 423
- Parties
- First Parties: Alexander Crum Ewing and another, testamentary trustees of the late Humphrey Ewing Crum Ewing of Strathleven; Second Parties: Rev. Paget Lambart Bayly and others, testamentary trustees of the late Mrs Jane Coventry Ewing Crum or Bayly; Third Party: Rev. Paget Lambart Bayly, as an individual; Fourth Parties: Mrs Helen Tolmie Dick Bayly or Douglas and others, daughters of Mrs Jane Coventry Ewing Crum or Bayly; Fifth Parties: Archibald John Angus Douglas and others, grandchildren of Mrs Jane Coventry Ewing Crum or Bayly
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 1910
- Procedural Posture
- Special Case (succession/trusts) / Inner House, First Division, Court of Session (final Judgment)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; questions answered as follows: fourth in the affirmative, fifth (a) in the negative, (b) superseded.
- Legal Topics
- Power of Appointment, Approbate and Reprobate, Election by Beneficiaries, Invalid Exercise of Power, Testamentary Dispositions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alexander Crum Ewing and another, testamentary trustees of the late Humphrey Ewing Crum Ewing of Strathleven
First Parties
Rev. Paget Lambart Bayly and others, testamentary trustees of the late Mrs Jane Coventry Ewing Crum or Bayly
Second Parties
Rev. Paget Lambart Bayly, as an individual
Third Party
Mrs Helen Tolmie Dick Bayly or Douglas and others, daughters of Mrs Jane Coventry Ewing Crum or Bayly
Fourth Parties
Archibald John Angus Douglas and others, grandchildren of Mrs Jane Coventry Ewing Crum or Bayly
Fifth Parties
Procedural Posture
Special Case (succession/trusts) / Inner House, First Division, Court of Session (final Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mrs Bayly validly exercised her power of appointment under her father's will
- 2 Whether her children are put to election between taking under her will and claiming under their grandfather's will
Ratio Decidendi
Mrs Bayly's exercise of the power of appointment was invalid; her will did not expressly or impliedly require her children to elect between taking under her will and claiming under their grandfather's will. The estates were separable, and no massing or condition of election was imposed regarding the grandfather's estate.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; questions answered as follows: fourth in the affirmative, fifth (a) in the negative, (b) superseded.
Orders
- Children of Mrs Bayly entitled to immediate payment of the capital of the one-third residue equally among them, share and share alike.
- Children not bound to renounce rights of fee as a condition of enjoying further provisions under Mrs Bayly's will.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment