GORDON JOHNSTONE AS EXECUTOR-NOMINATE OF THE LATE ELIZABETH KAYE AGAINST GORDON JOHNSTONE AS FORMER CONTINUING WELFARE ATTORNEY FOR THE LATE ELIZABETH KAYE AND GORDON JOHNSTONE AS EXECUTOR-NOMINATE OF THE LATE PETER KAYE [2023] ScotCS CSOH_30 (16 May 2023)
The Power of Attorney conferred wide powers on the attorneys, not limited by the specific powers in clause 3.17. The attorneys did not breach fiduciary duty in executing the Deed of Variation, and their satisfaction as to benefit under section 1(2) of the 2000 Act was not shown to be unreasonable. However, the attorneys failed to comply with section 1(4) by not seeking the views of Mrs Kaye's nearest relatives, which was a breach of duty. Nevertheless, this breach did not justify reduction of the Deed of Variation, as the failure was not sufficiently serious or consequential to warrant setting aside the transaction.
- Citation
- [2023] ScotCS CSOH_30
- Parties
- Pursuer: Gordon Johnstone as Executor-nominate of the late Elizabeth Kaye; First Defender: Gordon Johnstone as former continuing and welfare attorney for the late Elizabeth Kaye; Second Defender: Gordon Johnstone as Executor-nominate of the late Peter Kaye; Third Defender: Blind Veterans UK
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Declarator and Reduction / Procedure Roll Debate (preliminary Pleas) and Judgment
- Outcome
- Partial declarator granted; remainder of action dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Powers of Attorney, Fiduciary Duties, Adults With Incapacity (scotland) Act 2000, Deeds of Variation, Testamentary Capacity, Equitable Remedies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gordon Johnstone as Executor-nominate of the late Elizabeth Kaye
Pursuer
Gordon Johnstone as former continuing and welfare attorney for the late Elizabeth Kaye
First Defender
Gordon Johnstone as Executor-nominate of the late Peter Kaye
Second Defender
Blind Veterans UK
Third Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil Declarator and Reduction / Procedure Roll Debate (preliminary Pleas) and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether attorneys acted within the scope of the Power of Attorney in executing the Deed of Variation
- 2 Whether attorneys breached fiduciary duties under common law and the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000
- 3 Whether failure to consult nearest relatives under section 1(4) of the 2000 Act invalidated the Deed of Variation
Ratio Decidendi
The Power of Attorney conferred wide powers on the attorneys, not limited by the specific powers in clause 3.17. The attorneys did not breach fiduciary duty in executing the Deed of Variation, and their satisfaction as to benefit under section 1(2) of the 2000 Act was not shown to be unreasonable. However, the attorneys failed to comply with section 1(4) by not seeking the views of Mrs Kaye's nearest relatives, which was a breach of duty. Nevertheless, this breach did not justify reduction of the Deed of Variation, as the failure was not sufficiently serious or consequential to warrant setting aside the transaction.
Court Disposition
Partial declarator granted; remainder of action dismissed
Orders
- Declarator granted that the Deed of Variation was entered into in breach of duty under section 1(4) of the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000
- All other conclusions and pleas dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment