Beggs v The Scottish Ministers [2017] ScotCS CSOH_99 (06 July 2017)
Permission to proceed granted only on grounds relating to breach of legitimate expectation for HCPC correspondence on 6 May 2016 and irrationality in non-designation of legal regulatory bodies outside Scotland; no real prospect of success on Article 8 ECHR or other grounds.
- Citation
- [2017] ScotCS CSOH_99
- Parties
- Petitioner: William Beggs; Respondents: The Scottish Ministers
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 06 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Permission to Proceed
- Outcome
- Permission to proceed granted in part; refused in part
- Legal Topics
- Prisoner Correspondence, Legitimate Expectation, Article 8 ECHR, Confidential Mail, Regulatory Bodies, Proportionality, Irrationality
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Beggs
Petitioner
The Scottish Ministers
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Permission to Proceed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether opening of HCPC correspondence breached legitimate expectation
- 2 Whether refusal to designate correspondence with legal regulatory bodies outside Scotland as confidential is irrational
- 3 Whether opening of correspondence breached Article 8 ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to proceed granted only on grounds relating to breach of legitimate expectation for HCPC correspondence on 6 May 2016 and irrationality in non-designation of legal regulatory bodies outside Scotland; no real prospect of success on Article 8 ECHR or other grounds.
Court Disposition
Permission to proceed granted in part; refused in part
Orders
- Permission granted for grounds relating to breach of legitimate expectation (HCPC correspondence on 6 May 2016)
- Permission granted for grounds relating to irrationality in non-designation of legal regulatory bodies outside Scotland as confidential
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment