Neilson v. Borland, King, & Shaw [1902] ScotLR 39_417 (28 February 1902)
The roads in question are private streets within the meaning of the Glasgow Police Acts 1866–1900, not statute-labour roads vested in public authorities; respondents, as proprietors, are liable for repairs including the culvert, as required by statutory notice.
- Citation
- [1902] ScotLR 39_417
- Parties
- Petitioner: George Neilson, Procurator-Fiscal of Court; Respondents: Borland, King, & Shaw
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 1902
- Procedural Posture
- Petition and Application / Appeal From Dean of Guild Court to Court of Session Inner House
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; interlocutors of Dean of Guild Court recalled.
- Legal Topics
- Private Street Maintenance, Public Right of Way, Statutory Interpretation, Liability of Proprietors, Repair of Culverts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
George Neilson, Procurator-Fiscal of Court
Petitioner
Borland, King, & Shaw
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Petition and Application / Appeal From Dean of Guild Court to Court of Session Inner House
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether certain roads are private streets under Glasgow Police Acts 1866–1900
- 2 Whether respondents are 'proprietors' liable for repairs under the Acts
- 3 Whether liability extends to repair of culvert beneath private street
Ratio Decidendi
The roads in question are private streets within the meaning of the Glasgow Police Acts 1866–1900, not statute-labour roads vested in public authorities; respondents, as proprietors, are liable for repairs including the culvert, as required by statutory notice.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; interlocutors of Dean of Guild Court recalled.
Orders
- Respondents found liable to repair specified portions of Petershill Road and unnamed road to Low Balornock Farm.
- Respondents liable for proportionate cost of repairs, including culvert.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment