H.M. Advocate v. Gunning's Trustees [1902] ScotLR 39_534 (28 January 1902)
The debts in the bonds were not incurred for full consideration in money or money's worth, nor wholly for the deceased's own use and benefit. The capital sums in the bonds were not trust property within the meaning of the Finance Act 1894. Therefore, the sums in the bonds must be included in the estate for estate duty purposes.
- Citation
- [1902] ScotLR 39_534
- Parties
- Pursuer: H. M. Advocate; Defenders: Gunning's Trustees (Dame Mary Agnes Winwood Hughes or Gunning and others)
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 1902
- Procedural Posture
- Exchequer Cause / Outer House Judgment
- Outcome
- Decree for pursuer
- Legal Topics
- Property Passing on Death, Allowance for Debts, Trusts, Finance Act 1894
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
H. M. Advocate
Pursuer
Gunning's Trustees (Dame Mary Agnes Winwood Hughes or Gunning and others)
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Exchequer Cause / Outer House Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether debts in bonds granted by deceased for public purposes are deductible for estate duty under Finance Act 1894
- 2 Whether capital sums in bonds are property held in trust and exempt from estate duty
Ratio Decidendi
The debts in the bonds were not incurred for full consideration in money or money's worth, nor wholly for the deceased's own use and benefit. The capital sums in the bonds were not trust property within the meaning of the Finance Act 1894. Therefore, the sums in the bonds must be included in the estate for estate duty purposes.
Court Disposition
Decree for pursuer
Orders
- Defenders to pay pursuer £2013 as additional estate duty with interest at 3% from date of death
- Defenders to pay expenses
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment