Salt International Ltd (Formerly Nationwide Gritting Services Ltd) v The Scottish Ministers [2015] ScotCS CSIH_85 (01 December 2015)
The pursuers failed to prove that they would have tendered or succeeded in a compliant procurement process; the commercial judge's findings-in-fact are justified and unimpeachable; extreme urgency justified the negotiated procedure in winter 1, but not in winter 2; only damages are available as a remedy, and the pursuers failed to establish loss or a real chance; declaratory relief is not competent under the Regulations.
- Citation
- [2015] ScotCS CSIH_85
- Parties
- Pursuer and Reclaimer: Salt International Ltd (formerly Nationwide Gritting Services Ltd); Defender and Respondent: The Scottish Ministers
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Appeal (reclaiming Motion) / Inner House, Court of Session, Post Trial Appeal
- Outcome
- Reclaiming motion and cross-appeal refused; interlocutor of the commercial judge adhered to.
- Legal Topics
- Public Contracts (scotland) Regulations 2006, Extreme Urgency Derogation, Tender Procedures, Remedies for Breach, Damages, Declaratory Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Salt International Ltd (formerly Nationwide Gritting Services Ltd)
Pursuer and Reclaimer
The Scottish Ministers
Defender and Respondent
Procedural Posture
Commercial Appeal (reclaiming Motion) / Inner House, Court of Session, Post Trial Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Scottish Ministers breached the Public Contracts (Scotland) Regulations 2006 in purchasing de-icing salt without tender procedures
- 2 Whether extreme urgency justified derogation from tender procedures
- 3 Whether Salt International Ltd would have tendered and succeeded in a compliant procurement process
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuers failed to prove that they would have tendered or succeeded in a compliant procurement process; the commercial judge's findings-in-fact are justified and unimpeachable; extreme urgency justified the negotiated procedure in winter 1, but not in winter 2; only damages are available as a remedy, and the pursuers failed to establish loss or a real chance; declaratory relief is not competent under the Regulations.
Court Disposition
Reclaiming motion and cross-appeal refused; interlocutor of the commercial judge adhered to.
Orders
- Defenders assoilzied (absolved) from liability.
- Pursuers liable for 90% of expenses.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment