Fraser & Company v. Donaldson, [2005] ScotSC 54 (08 September 2005)
There was no consensus or binding agreement reached on 4 December 2003 to settle the account for £1,200; the original contract and invoice for £1,638.25 (after credit for payments) stands, and the sheriff's findings of fact and assessment of credibility are not open to interference on appeal in the absence of notes of evidence or error of law.
- Citation
- [2005] ScotSC 54
- Parties
- Pursuers and Respondents: Graeme Fraser & Co; Defender and Appellant: Lynne Donaldson
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 08 September 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff's Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal refused; sheriff's judgment affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Quantum Meruit, Contract Formation, Appeals, Professional Fees
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Graeme Fraser & Co
Pursuers and Respondents
Lynne Donaldson
Defender and Appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff's Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a binding agreement was reached between the parties to settle the outstanding account for a reduced sum
- 2 Whether the sheriff erred in assessing the credibility of the defender and the facts
- 3 Whether the original invoice amount was reasonable remuneration for services rendered
Ratio Decidendi
There was no consensus or binding agreement reached on 4 December 2003 to settle the account for £1,200; the original contract and invoice for £1,638.25 (after credit for payments) stands, and the sheriff's findings of fact and assessment of credibility are not open to interference on appeal in the absence of notes of evidence or error of law.
Court Disposition
Appeal refused; sheriff's judgment affirmed.
Orders
- Defender and appellant found liable to pursuers and respondents in expenses of the appeal.
- Account of expenses to be lodged and remitted to auditor of court to tax and report.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment