Graeme Fraser & Company v. Donaldson [2005] ScotSC 58 (08 September 2005)
There was no consensus or binding agreement reached between the parties to settle the account for £1,200 during the telephone conversation. The original contract and invoice for professional services remained enforceable, and the sheriff's findings of fact were not open to challenge in the absence of notes of evidence or clear error.
- Citation
- [2005] ScotSC 58
- Parties
- Pursuers and Respondents: Graeme Fraser & Co; Defender and Appellant: Lynne Donaldson
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 08 September 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal refused; interlocutor of sheriff adhered to.
- Legal Topics
- Quantum Meruit, Contract Formation, Appeals, Professional Fees
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Graeme Fraser & Co
Pursuers and Respondents
Lynne Donaldson
Defender and Appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a binding agreement was reached between the parties to settle the outstanding account for a reduced sum
- 2 Whether the sheriff erred in finding no consensus or new contract was formed
- 3 Whether the sheriff misapprehended material facts regarding the defender's ability to pay
Ratio Decidendi
There was no consensus or binding agreement reached between the parties to settle the account for £1,200 during the telephone conversation. The original contract and invoice for professional services remained enforceable, and the sheriff's findings of fact were not open to challenge in the absence of notes of evidence or clear error.
Court Disposition
Appeal refused; interlocutor of sheriff adhered to.
Orders
- Defender and appellant found liable to pursuers and respondents in expenses of the appeal.
- Account of expenses to be given in and remitted to auditor of court to tax and report.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment