Crampshee v. North Lanarkshire Council [2004] ScotCS CSOH_37 (20 February 2004)
Clauses eleventh and fourteenth of the Deed of Conditions are sufficiently precise to constitute valid and enforceable real burdens; the defenders' right to appoint themselves as factors does not create an unlawful monopoly or offend public policy; the obligation to pay for maintenance is a valid real burden transmitting with the land.
- Citation
- [2004] ScotCS CSOH_37
- Parties
- Pursuer: Norma Mahon Crampshee; Defenders: North Lanarkshire Council
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Judgment on Relevancy and Declarator
- Outcome
- Pursuer's first and second pleas-in-law repelled; defenders' fourth and fifth pleas-in-law sustained; defenders assoilzied from parts (first) and (second) of the first conclusion and from the second conclusion; proof allowed on remaining issues.
- Legal Topics
- Real Burdens, Title Conditions, Factoring Arrangements, Common Property, Maintenance Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Norma Mahon Crampshee
Pursuer
North Lanarkshire Council
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Judgment on Relevancy and Declarator
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether clauses eleventh and fourteenth of the Deed of Conditions constitute enforceable real burdens against the pursuer
- 2 Whether the defenders' right to appoint themselves as factors is contrary to public policy or creates an unenforceable monopoly
- 3 Whether the obligation to pay for maintenance is sufficiently precise to be a real burden
Ratio Decidendi
Clauses eleventh and fourteenth of the Deed of Conditions are sufficiently precise to constitute valid and enforceable real burdens; the defenders' right to appoint themselves as factors does not create an unlawful monopoly or offend public policy; the obligation to pay for maintenance is a valid real burden transmitting with the land.
Court Disposition
Pursuer's first and second pleas-in-law repelled; defenders' fourth and fifth pleas-in-law sustained; defenders assoilzied from parts (first) and (second) of the first conclusion and from the second conclusion; proof allowed on remaining issues.
Orders
- Repel pursuer's first and second pleas-in-law
- Sustain defenders' fourth and fifth pleas-in-law
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment