Hill of Rubislaw (Q Seven) Ltd v Rubislaw Quarry Aberdeen Ltd &c [2014] ScotCS CSIH_105 (28 November 2014)
Clause 2.1 of the minute of agreement is a valid and enforceable real burden under the Title Conditions (Scotland) Act 2003 because it benefits the neighbouring office properties by protecting their rental and capital values, satisfies the praedial rule, is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, and, properly construed, restricts the construction (not merely letting) of office space on the Northern Quarry Subjects.
- Citation
- [2014] ScotCS CSIH_105
- Parties
- Pursuers and Reclaimers: Hill of Rubislaw (Q Seven) Limited; Defenders and Respondents: Rubislaw Quarry Aberdeen Limited & others
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Property Dispute / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Decision of Lord Ordinary
- Outcome
- Reclaiming motion refused; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary adhered to.
- Legal Topics
- Real Burdens, Title Conditions (scotland) Act 2003, Restraint of Trade, Interpretation of Commercial Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hill of Rubislaw (Q Seven) Limited
Pursuers and Reclaimers
Rubislaw Quarry Aberdeen Limited & others
Defenders and Respondents
Procedural Posture
Commercial Property Dispute / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Decision of Lord Ordinary
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether clause 2.1 of the minute of agreement constitutes a valid and enforceable real burden under the Title Conditions (Scotland) Act 2003
- 2 Whether clause 2.1 is void as an unreasonable restraint of trade
- 3 Proper construction of clause 2.1: does it restrict only letting or also construction of office space
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 2.1 of the minute of agreement is a valid and enforceable real burden under the Title Conditions (Scotland) Act 2003 because it benefits the neighbouring office properties by protecting their rental and capital values, satisfies the praedial rule, is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, and, properly construed, restricts the construction (not merely letting) of office space on the Northern Quarry Subjects.
Court Disposition
Reclaiming motion refused; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary adhered to.
Orders
- Declarator that clause 2.1 is not a real burden refused.
- Declarator that clause 2.1 restricts only letting and not construction refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment