Lindop v Stuart Noble & Sons Ltd & Ors [1998] ScotCS 1 (7 April 1998)

Lindop v Stuart Noble & Sons Ltd & Ors [1998] ScotCS 1 (7 April 1998)

The pursuer's claim for salary and benefits in lieu of notice, arising from the termination of his adopted contract of employment by the receivers, does not fall within the scope of section 60(1)(c) of the Insolvency Act 1986 for priority ranking. Parliament intended to restrict priority for employees' claims to qualifying liabilities for which the receiver is personally liable, and section 60(1)(c) does not extend to liabilities arising from breach of pre-receivership contracts. The statutory scheme and policy underlying the rescue culture require a restrictive interpretation to avoid undermining the receivership process.

Citation
[1998] ScotCS 1
Parties
Pursuer: Roger Lindop; Defenders: Stuart Noble & Sons Ltd & Others
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
07 April 1998
Procedural Posture
Civil Employment/receivership / Debate on Relevancy and Ranking of Claim
Outcome
Pursuer's claim to priority under section 60(1)(c) rejected; claim held irrelevant for priority ranking.
Legal Topics
Receivership, Priority of Claims, Contracts of Employment, Statutory Interpretation, Agency, Redundancy Payments
Insolvency Law Employment Law Company Law Receivership Priority of Claims Contracts of Employment Statutory Interpretation Agency +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Roger Lindop

Pursuer

Stuart Noble & Sons Ltd & Others

Defenders

Procedural Posture

Civil Employment/receivership / Debate on Relevancy and Ranking of Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the pursuer's claim for salary and benefits in lieu of notice ranks in priority under section 60(1)(c) of the Insolvency Act 1986 as a liability incurred by or on behalf of the receiver.
  2. 2 Whether the adoption of the contract of employment by the receiver entitles the pursuer to priority ranking for his claim under Scottish insolvency law.

Ratio Decidendi

The pursuer's claim for salary and benefits in lieu of notice, arising from the termination of his adopted contract of employment by the receivers, does not fall within the scope of section 60(1)(c) of the Insolvency Act 1986 for priority ranking. Parliament intended to restrict priority for employees' claims to qualifying liabilities for which the receiver is personally liable, and section 60(1)(c) does not extend to liabilities arising from breach of pre-receivership contracts. The statutory scheme and policy underlying the rescue culture require a restrictive interpretation to avoid undermining the receivership process.

Court Disposition

Pursuer's claim to priority under section 60(1)(c) rejected; claim held irrelevant for priority ranking.

Orders

  • Pursuer's averments on priority under section 60(1)(c) dismissed as irrelevant.
  • No declarator of priority ranking granted.