Aberdeen City Council v. Robb [2004] ScotSC 6 (20 January 2004)
A fair-minded and informed observer would conclude that there was a real possibility of bias where the sheriff withdrew from the case on one occasion due to prior involvement but presided at a subsequent hearing on the same substantive issues, thus breaching Article 6(1) ECHR.
- Citation
- [2004] ScotSC 6
- Parties
- Pursuer and Respondent: Aberdeen City Council; Defender and Appellant: Alistair Herbert Robb
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (summary Cause Housing) / Appeal From Order for Recovery of Possession
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; order of 4 September 2003 recalled; no expenses due to or by either party; cause remitted to sheriff to proceed as accords.
- Legal Topics
- Recovery of Possession, Anti Social Behaviour, Judicial Impartiality, Article 6 ECHR, Summary Cause Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aberdeen City Council
Pursuer and Respondent
Alistair Herbert Robb
Defender and Appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal (summary Cause Housing) / Appeal From Order for Recovery of Possession
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sheriff's participation breached Article 6(1) ECHR due to lack of impartiality
- 2 Whether it was competent for the sheriff to grant decree for recovery of possession at a procedural hearing
Ratio Decidendi
A fair-minded and informed observer would conclude that there was a real possibility of bias where the sheriff withdrew from the case on one occasion due to prior involvement but presided at a subsequent hearing on the same substantive issues, thus breaching Article 6(1) ECHR.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; order of 4 September 2003 recalled; no expenses due to or by either party; cause remitted to sheriff to proceed as accords.
Orders
- Recall of order dated 4 September 2003
- No expenses due to or by either party in respect of the appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment