Fraser Trading Co & Ors v Bank Of Scotland [2000] ScotCS 300 (1 December 2000)

Fraser Trading Co & Ors v Bank Of Scotland [2000] ScotCS 300 (1 December 2000)

The pleadings, both original and as proposed to be amended, failed to disclose any relevant defence to the Bank's claim for payment or any prima facie right to damages exceeding the debt. The contract did not oblige the Bank to provide further funding beyond the initial facility, and the alleged misrepresentations were not actionable. There was no quantification or basis for loss. Accordingly, the reclaiming motion and the Minute of Amendment were refused.

Citation
[2000] ScotCS 300
Parties
Pursuers and Reclaimers: Fraser Trading Company and Others; Defenders and Respondents: The Governor & Company of the Bank of Scotland
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
01 December 2000
Procedural Posture
Reclaiming Motion (appeal) / Judgment on Relevancy and Amendment
Outcome
Reclaiming motion refused; Minute of Amendment refused.
Legal Topics
Reduction of Decree, Breach of Contract, Negligent Misrepresentation, Summary Decree, Pleading Relevancy, Amendment of Pleadings
Contract Law Banking Law Civil Procedure Reduction of Decree Breach of Contract Negligent Misrepresentation Summary Decree Pleading Relevancy +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fraser Trading Company and Others

Pursuers and Reclaimers

The Governor & Company of the Bank of Scotland

Defenders and Respondents

Procedural Posture

Reclaiming Motion (appeal) / Judgment on Relevancy and Amendment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the pleadings disclosed a prima facie defence to the action of payment
  2. 2 Whether the proposed Minute of Amendment rendered the case relevant
  3. 3 Whether there was a valid claim for breach of contract or negligent misrepresentation against the Bank

Ratio Decidendi

The pleadings, both original and as proposed to be amended, failed to disclose any relevant defence to the Bank's claim for payment or any prima facie right to damages exceeding the debt. The contract did not oblige the Bank to provide further funding beyond the initial facility, and the alleged misrepresentations were not actionable. There was no quantification or basis for loss. Accordingly, the reclaiming motion and the Minute of Amendment were refused.

Court Disposition

Reclaiming motion refused; Minute of Amendment refused.

Orders

  • Minute of Amendment refused
  • Reclaiming motion refused