STEWART AGAINST UK ACORN FINANCE LIMITED [2018] ScotCS CSOH_31 (04 April 2018)
The pursuer failed to establish exceptional circumstances or a miscarriage of justice justifying reduction of the sheriff court decree. The sheriff was entitled to find the property was not used for residential purposes and to reject the defence of fraudulent misrepresentation, as there was no credible evidence of a binding promise or guarantee by the defender. The pursuer's failure to appeal the decree and lack of substantive new evidence precluded reduction.
- Citation
- [2018] ScotCS CSOH_31
- Parties
- Pursuer: Peter Stewart; Defender: UK Acorn Finance Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Reduction of Decree / Outer House, Court of Session Opinion After Proof Before Answer
- Outcome
- Action dismissed; decree of absolvitor granted in favour of the defender.
- Legal Topics
- Reduction of Decree in Foro, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Residential Property Definition, Remedies Under Standard Security, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Stewart
Pursuer
UK Acorn Finance Limited
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil Reduction of Decree / Outer House, Court of Session Opinion After Proof Before Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuer is entitled to reduction of the sheriff court decree and warrant of removing on grounds of deprivation of opportunity to present defences
- 2 Whether the defender made a binding promise to provide medium-term finance
- 3 Whether the property was used to any extent for residential purposes under the Conveyancing and Feudal Reform (Scotland) Act 1970
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuer failed to establish exceptional circumstances or a miscarriage of justice justifying reduction of the sheriff court decree. The sheriff was entitled to find the property was not used for residential purposes and to reject the defence of fraudulent misrepresentation, as there was no credible evidence of a binding promise or guarantee by the defender. The pursuer's failure to appeal the decree and lack of substantive new evidence precluded reduction.
Court Disposition
Action dismissed; decree of absolvitor granted in favour of the defender.
Orders
- Pursuer's pleas in law repelled.
- Defender's second to fifth pleas in law sustained.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment