Martin Currie Ltd, Re and Order [2006] ScotCS CSOH_77 (17 May 2006)
The court confirmed the cancellation of the share premium account and dispensed with the requirements of sections 136(3) to (5) because the company's assets, including conservative valuations of shareholdings in subsidiaries, provided a substantial margin of solvency and there was no significant risk of prejudice to creditors.
- Citation
- [2006] ScotCS CSOH_77
- Parties
- Petitioner: Martin Currie Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Petition for Order Confirming Cancellation of Share Premium Account / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition granted
- Legal Topics
- Reduction of Share Premium Account, Creditor Protection, Companies Act 1985 Section 136
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martin Currie Limited
Petitioner
Procedural Posture
Petition for Order Confirming Cancellation of Share Premium Account / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should confirm the cancellation of the share premium account and dispense with the requirements of sections 136(3) to (5) of the Companies Act 1985 regarding creditor protection
Ratio Decidendi
The court confirmed the cancellation of the share premium account and dispensed with the requirements of sections 136(3) to (5) because the company's assets, including conservative valuations of shareholdings in subsidiaries, provided a substantial margin of solvency and there was no significant risk of prejudice to creditors.
Court Disposition
Petition granted
Orders
- Subsections (3) to (5) of section 136 of the Companies Act 1985 shall not apply as regards the creditors of the company.
- Cancellation of the company's share premium account confirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment