Hann (AP) v Howatson [2014] ScotCS CSOH_69 (11 April 2014)
The prior personal obligation undertaken by Doris to convey Powfoot Hall to James was binding and enforceable, rendering her subsequent testamentary bequest to George invalid to the extent of the property; the case turns on the principles in Paterson v Paterson, not on the 'offside goal rule' from Rodger v Fawdry, as there was no issue of bad faith.
- Citation
- [2014] ScotCS CSOH_69
- Parties
- Pursuer: George Hann; Defender: Jennifer Rosalyn Spence Howatson
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action for Reduction of Will and Confirmation / Interlocutory Judgment on Relevancy and Admissibility of Averments
- Outcome
- Partial sustaining of defender's plea-in-law; exclusion of averments of bad faith from probation; remainder of record sent for proof before answer; expenses reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Reduction of Testamentary Deeds, Prior Personal Obligations, Offside Goal Rule, Bad Faith in Succession
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
George Hann
Pursuer
Jennifer Rosalyn Spence Howatson
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil Action for Reduction of Will and Confirmation / Interlocutory Judgment on Relevancy and Admissibility of Averments
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a prior personal obligation to convey property defeats a subsequent testamentary bequest
- 2 Applicability of the 'offside goal rule' to gratuitous bequests
- 3 Relevancy of averments of bad faith in the context of succession
Ratio Decidendi
The prior personal obligation undertaken by Doris to convey Powfoot Hall to James was binding and enforceable, rendering her subsequent testamentary bequest to George invalid to the extent of the property; the case turns on the principles in Paterson v Paterson, not on the 'offside goal rule' from Rodger v Fawdry, as there was no issue of bad faith.
Court Disposition
Partial sustaining of defender's plea-in-law; exclusion of averments of bad faith from probation; remainder of record sent for proof before answer; expenses reserved.
Orders
- Words 'in bad faith and' on line 10 of article 5 of the condescendence excluded from probation.
- Defender's second plea-in-law sustained in part.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment