CHILDRENS HEARING APPEAL J AND S.Y. [2010] ScotSC 181 (03 November 2010)

CHILDRENS HEARING APPEAL J AND S.Y. [2010] ScotSC 181 (03 November 2010)

A grandmother in whose favour a contact order has been made acquires a civil right to contact, and the definition of 'relevant person' in section 93 of the Children (Scotland) Act 1995 must be read compatibly with Article 6 ECHR to include such persons. The Children's Hearing erred in law by refusing to regard the Appellant as a relevant person.

Citation
[2010] ScotSC 181
Parties
Appellant/grandmother: MH; Respondent/reporter: Scottish Children's Reporter Administration; Child: JY; Child: SY; Safeguarder for the Children: Miss Henderson
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
03 November 2010
Procedural Posture
Children's Hearing Appeal / Appeal From Children's Hearing Decision
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Relevant Person Status, Contact Orders, Children's Hearings, Article 6 ECHR, Interpretation of Children (scotland) Act 1995

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

MH

Appellant/grandmother

Scottish Children's Reporter Administration

Respondent/reporter

JY

Child

SY

Child

Miss Henderson

Safeguarder for the Children

Procedural Posture

Children's Hearing Appeal / Appeal From Children's Hearing Decision

  1. 1 Whether a grandmother with a contact order should be regarded as a 'relevant person' under section 93 of the Children (Scotland) Act 1995
  2. 2 Whether refusal to grant 'relevant person' status breaches Article 6 ECHR rights to a fair hearing

Ratio Decidendi

A grandmother in whose favour a contact order has been made acquires a civil right to contact, and the definition of 'relevant person' in section 93 of the Children (Scotland) Act 1995 must be read compatibly with Article 6 ECHR to include such persons. The Children's Hearing erred in law by refusing to regard the Appellant as a relevant person.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Matter remitted to the Children's Hearing for reconsideration, particularly in respect of its decision that the children should have no contact with MH.