FORTHWELL LTD AGAINST PONTAGADEA UK LTD [2024] ScotCS CSOH_59 (13 June 2024)
The lease and insurance arrangements do not preclude the pursuer from seeking damages as an alternative to specific implement for the landlord's failure to reinstate the premises after an insured risk. In Scots law, the pursuer may recover losses suffered by its wholly owned subsidiary where the loss would otherwise go uncompensated, as a matter of policy, not contractual intention.
- Citation
- [2024] ScotCS CSOH_59
- Parties
- Pursuer: Forthwell Limited; Defender: Pontegadea UK Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 13 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Action (outer House, Court of Session, Scotland) / Debate on Relevancy; Interlocutory Decision Allowing Proof Before Answer
- Outcome
- Defender's pleas on the insurance and transferred loss issues repelled; proof before answer allowed; defender found liable in expenses of the debate.
- Legal Topics
- Remedies for Breach of Lease, Insurance and Subrogation in Leases, Transferred Loss Doctrine, Recovery of Third Party Losses, Specific Implement Vs Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Forthwell Limited
Pursuer
Pontegadea UK Limited
Defender
Procedural Posture
Commercial Action (outer House, Court of Session, Scotland) / Debate on Relevancy; Interlocutory Decision Allowing Proof Before Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the lease and insurance arrangements preclude the tenant from claiming damages for an insured risk (the insurance issue)
- 2 Whether the pursuer can recover losses sustained by its wholly owned subsidiary (the transferred loss issue)
Ratio Decidendi
The lease and insurance arrangements do not preclude the pursuer from seeking damages as an alternative to specific implement for the landlord's failure to reinstate the premises after an insured risk. In Scots law, the pursuer may recover losses suffered by its wholly owned subsidiary where the loss would otherwise go uncompensated, as a matter of policy, not contractual intention.
Court Disposition
Defender's pleas on the insurance and transferred loss issues repelled; proof before answer allowed; defender found liable in expenses of the debate.
Orders
- Repel defender's second and seventh pleas-in-law
- Allow parties a proof before answer
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment