Mackie v. Davidson [1913] ScotLR 461 (25 February 1913)
The Court held that the injuries and damages claimed were substantial, including serious personal injury, permanent disfigurement, nervous shock, and significant property loss, making the case suitable for jury trial and not appropriate for remit to the Sheriff Court.
- Citation
- [1913] ScotLR 461
- Parties
- Pursuer: William Thomas Mackie; Defender: Duncan Davidson
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 1913
- Procedural Posture
- Damages at Common Law for Personal Injury and Property Damage / Motion for Remit to Sheriff or Order for Jury Trial Issues in Court of Session
- Outcome
- Motion to remit to Sheriff refused; issues ordered for jury trial in Court of Session.
- Legal Topics
- Remit for Jury Trial, Sheriff Courts (scotland) Act 1907, Personal Injury, Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Thomas Mackie
Pursuer
Duncan Davidson
Defender
Procedural Posture
Damages at Common Law for Personal Injury and Property Damage / Motion for Remit to Sheriff or Order for Jury Trial Issues in Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the case should be remitted back to the Sheriff Court or proceed to jury trial in the Court of Session under Sheriff Courts (Scotland) Act 1907, sec. 30
- 2 Whether the action is of a substantial character suitable for jury trial
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the injuries and damages claimed were substantial, including serious personal injury, permanent disfigurement, nervous shock, and significant property loss, making the case suitable for jury trial and not appropriate for remit to the Sheriff Court.
Court Disposition
Motion to remit to Sheriff refused; issues ordered for jury trial in Court of Session.
Orders
- Court ordered issues for jury trial.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment