Appeal in the cause JM against KB and EH (Sheriff Appeal Court Civil) [2024] SACCIV 36 (01 August 2024)

Appeal in the cause JM against KB and EH (Sheriff Appeal Court Civil) [2024] SACCIV 36 (01 August 2024)

The appeal is incompetent because the orders sought (residence and contact) can no longer be granted after the child reached the age of 16, at which point all relevant parental rights and responsibilities and court orders expired by operation of law.

Citation
[2024] SACCIV 36
Parties
Pursuer and First Respondent: JM; Defender and Appellant: KB; Third Party Minuter and Second Respondent: EH
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
01 August 2024
Procedural Posture
Family Law Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff's Judgment on Residence and Contact Orders
Outcome
Appeal refused as incompetent
Legal Topics
Residence Orders, Contact Orders, Parental Rights and Responsibilities, Legal Capacity of Children, Appeal Competency

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

JM

Pursuer and First Respondent

KB

Defender and Appellant

EH

Third Party Minuter and Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family Law Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff's Judgment on Residence and Contact Orders

  1. 1 Whether the appeal is competent after the child attained age 16
  2. 2 Whether the sheriff's orders remain enforceable after the child turned 16
  3. 3 Whether the appellant is entitled to seek residence or contact orders post-16

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal is incompetent because the orders sought (residence and contact) can no longer be granted after the child reached the age of 16, at which point all relevant parental rights and responsibilities and court orders expired by operation of law.

Court Disposition

Appeal refused as incompetent

Orders

  • Appellant found liable to both respondents in the expenses of the appeal
  • Appeal sanctioned as suitable for employment of first respondent's solicitor advocate and second respondent's counsel