Waydale Ltd v DHL Holdings (UK) Ltd [1998] ScotCS 71 (19 November 1998)

Waydale Ltd v DHL Holdings (UK) Ltd [1998] ScotCS 71 (19 November 1998)

A prior decree of dismissal does not automatically preclude a subsequent action; where the new action is based on a new substantive matter (here, deeds of assignation not present in the prior action), the plea of res judicata fails.

Citation
[1998] ScotCS 71
Parties
Pursuer: Waydale Limited; Defender: DHL Holdings (UK) Limited
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
19 November 1998
Procedural Posture
Commercial Action / Debate on Plea of Res Iudicata
Outcome
Defenders' first plea-in-law (res judicata) repelled; case to proceed.
Legal Topics
Res Judicata, Guarantee Enforcement, Assignation of Rights, Title to Sue
Civil Procedure Contract Law Res Judicata Guarantee Enforcement Assignation of Rights Title to Sue

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 20 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Waydale Limited

Pursuer

DHL Holdings (UK) Limited

Defender

Procedural Posture

Commercial Action / Debate on Plea of Res Iudicata

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a prior decree of dismissal can found a plea of res judicata in a subsequent action
  2. 2 Whether the requirements for res judicata are satisfied given the differences between the prior and present actions

Ratio Decidendi

A prior decree of dismissal does not automatically preclude a subsequent action; where the new action is based on a new substantive matter (here, deeds of assignation not present in the prior action), the plea of res judicata fails.

Court Disposition

Defenders' first plea-in-law (res judicata) repelled; case to proceed.

Orders

  • Repel defenders' first plea-in-law
  • Put case out By Order for further procedure