Logan v Logan & Anor [2010] ScotCS CSOH_123 (01 September 2010)

Logan v Logan & Anor [2010] ScotCS CSOH_123 (01 September 2010)

The pursuer is entitled to damages for pain and suffering, services, and loss of income, but the quantum must be based on credible evidence. The court accepted the pursuer's ongoing symptoms and business loss but found her evidence unreliable in some respects and reduced the claimed amounts accordingly. The court valued solatium at £10,000, services at £1,500, and calculated past and future income loss based on a four-day working week, using a multiplier of 5 and a multiplicand of £6,251 for future loss.

Citation
[2010] ScotCS CSOH_123
Parties
Pursuer: Melanie Logan; First Defender: William Logan; Second Defender: GHI Insurance Services UK Ltd
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
01 September 2010
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury/reparation / Quantum of Damages After Admission of Liability
Outcome
Decree for pursuer in part; damages awarded for solatium, services, and loss of income, but at reduced amounts from those claimed.
Legal Topics
Road Traffic Accident, Whiplash Injury, Adjustment Disorder, Loss of Earnings, Solatium, Services Under Administration of Justice Act 1982

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Melanie Logan

Pursuer

William Logan

First Defender

GHI Insurance Services UK Ltd

Second Defender

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury/reparation / Quantum of Damages After Admission of Liability

  1. 1 Appropriate quantum for solatium (pain and suffering)
  2. 2 Assessment of services rendered under Administration of Justice Act 1982 s.8
  3. 3 Calculation of past and future loss of income due to accident

Ratio Decidendi

The pursuer is entitled to damages for pain and suffering, services, and loss of income, but the quantum must be based on credible evidence. The court accepted the pursuer's ongoing symptoms and business loss but found her evidence unreliable in some respects and reduced the claimed amounts accordingly. The court valued solatium at £10,000, services at £1,500, and calculated past and future income loss based on a four-day working week, using a multiplier of 5 and a multiplicand of £6,251 for future loss.

Court Disposition

Decree for pursuer in part; damages awarded for solatium, services, and loss of income, but at reduced amounts from those claimed.

Orders

  • Award of £10,000 for solatium (pain and suffering), two-thirds to past with interest at 4%
  • Award of £1,500 for services under Administration of Justice Act 1982 s.8