Paton's Trustee v. Finlayson and Others [1923] ScotLR 548 (11 July 1923)

Paton's Trustee v. Finlayson and Others [1923] ScotLR 548 (11 July 1923)

The farmers retained actual possession of the potatoes pitted on their land under both forms of contract. Under the Sale of Goods Act 1893, the unpaid seller's right of retention is lost only when the buyer lawfully obtains possession, which had not occurred here. In mutual contracts for rented ground, the farmers' possession and the doctrine of mutuality entitled them to retain the potatoes until payment of rent. Thus, the farmers had a right of retention or lien at the date of sequestration and are entitled to a preferable ranking on the bankrupt estate.

Citation
[1923] ScotLR 548
Parties
First Party: George Kirkwood Johnston, C. A., Edinburgh, trustee on the sequestrated estates of Robert Paton, potato merchant and grower, Edinburgh; Second Party: Mrs Isabella Robertson or Finlayson, executrix of the late William Finlayson, farmer, Crieff; Third Party: Andrew Alexander Cameron, Doune; Fourth Parties: Mrs Janet M'Caull or Lennox, Dunblane, and others
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
11 July 1923
Procedural Posture
Special Case (court of Session, Inner House, Second Division) / Judgment on Questions of Law Regarding Rights of Retention/lien in Bankruptcy
Outcome
Questions of law answered in the affirmative in favour of the farmers (second, third, and fourth parties).
Legal Topics
Sale of Goods, Lien and Retention, Possession, Mutual Contracts, Bankruptcy and Preferential Claims
Commercial Law Bankruptcy Law Contract Law Property Law Sale of Goods Lien and Retention Possession Mutual Contracts +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

George Kirkwood Johnston, C. A., Edinburgh, trustee on the sequestrated estates of Robert Paton, potato merchant and grower, Edinburgh

First Party

Mrs Isabella Robertson or Finlayson, executrix of the late William Finlayson, farmer, Crieff

Second Party

Andrew Alexander Cameron, Doune

Third Party

Mrs Janet M'Caull or Lennox, Dunblane, and others

Fourth Parties

Procedural Posture

Special Case (court of Session, Inner House, Second Division) / Judgment on Questions of Law Regarding Rights of Retention/lien in Bankruptcy

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether under the first form of contract (sale of growing potatoes) the farmers had a statutory right of lien or retention over potatoes pitted on their land at the date of sequestration.
  2. 2 Whether under the second form of contract (rented ground for growing potatoes) the farmers had a common law right of lien or retention over potatoes for unpaid rent at the date of sequestration.
  3. 3 Whether the farmers are entitled to a preferable ranking on the bankrupt estate under either contract.

Ratio Decidendi

The farmers retained actual possession of the potatoes pitted on their land under both forms of contract. Under the Sale of Goods Act 1893, the unpaid seller's right of retention is lost only when the buyer lawfully obtains possession, which had not occurred here. In mutual contracts for rented ground, the farmers' possession and the doctrine of mutuality entitled them to retain the potatoes until payment of rent. Thus, the farmers had a right of retention or lien at the date of sequestration and are entitled to a preferable ranking on the bankrupt estate.

Court Disposition

Questions of law answered in the affirmative in favour of the farmers (second, third, and fourth parties).

Orders

  • Farmers had a right of lien or retention over the potatoes at the date of sequestration under both contract types.
  • Farmers entitled to a preferable ranking on the bankrupt estate for unpaid price or rent.