Buchan, Re Application For Judicial Review [2001] ScotCS 175 (3 July 2001)
The statutory consultation requirements were met, the process was not unfair, all relevant factors were considered, and the decision was not irrational; no violation of human rights occurred due to permitted derogations.
- Citation
- [2001] ScotCS 175
- Parties
- Petitioner: Susan Buchan; First Respondent: Education Services Committee of West Lothian Council; Second Respondent: Scottish Ministers
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 03 July 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- School Closure, Consultation Requirements, Natural Justice, Irrationality, European Convention on Human Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Susan Buchan
Petitioner
Education Services Committee of West Lothian Council
First Respondent
Scottish Ministers
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the consultation process for school closure was unfair or a sham
- 2 Whether the decision to close Abercorn Primary School was irrational
- 3 Whether the closure violated Article 2, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory consultation requirements were met, the process was not unfair, all relevant factors were considered, and the decision was not irrational; no violation of human rights occurred due to permitted derogations.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed
Orders
- First respondent's first and second pleas in law sustained
- Petition dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment