Buchan, Re Application For Judicial Review [2001] ScotCS 175 (3 July 2001)

Buchan, Re Application For Judicial Review [2001] ScotCS 175 (3 July 2001)

The statutory consultation requirements were met, the process was not unfair, all relevant factors were considered, and the decision was not irrational; no violation of human rights occurred due to permitted derogations.

Citation
[2001] ScotCS 175
Parties
Petitioner: Susan Buchan; First Respondent: Education Services Committee of West Lothian Council; Second Respondent: Scottish Ministers
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
03 July 2001
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Outcome
Petition dismissed
Legal Topics
School Closure, Consultation Requirements, Natural Justice, Irrationality, European Convention on Human Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Susan Buchan

Petitioner

Education Services Committee of West Lothian Council

First Respondent

Scottish Ministers

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the consultation process for school closure was unfair or a sham
  2. 2 Whether the decision to close Abercorn Primary School was irrational
  3. 3 Whether the closure violated Article 2, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights

Ratio Decidendi

The statutory consultation requirements were met, the process was not unfair, all relevant factors were considered, and the decision was not irrational; no violation of human rights occurred due to permitted derogations.

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed

Orders

  • First respondent's first and second pleas in law sustained
  • Petition dismissed