Comhairle Nan Eilean Siar (Constituted As The Western Islands Council) v The Scottish Ministers [2013] ScotCS CSIH_6 (06 February 2013)
Scottish Ministers, upon call-in of a closure proposal under the Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010, are obliged to consider both procedural aspects and the substantive merits of the proposal before determining consent; however, the call-in notices issued remain valid even if the Ministers misunderstood the extent of their powers post-call-in.
- Citation
- [2013] ScotCS CSIH_6
- Parties
- Petitioners and Respondents: Comhairle Nan Eilean Siar (constituted as the Western Islands Council); Respondents and Reclaimers: The Scottish Ministers
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal (reclaiming Motion)
- Outcome
- Grounds of Appeal 2 and 3 allowed in part; Lord Ordinary's interlocutors recalled insofar as they grant declarator and reduce call-in notices; cross-grounds of appeal refused; case put out By Order for further procedure.
- Legal Topics
- School Closure Procedures, Ministerial Powers, Statutory Interpretation, Consultation Requirements, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Comhairle Nan Eilean Siar (constituted as the Western Islands Council)
Petitioners and Respondents
The Scottish Ministers
Respondents and Reclaimers
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal (reclaiming Motion)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Scottish Ministers' powers on call-in of school closure proposals are restricted to procedural checks or extend to assessment of substantive merits
- 2 Validity of call-in notices issued under the Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010
Ratio Decidendi
Scottish Ministers, upon call-in of a closure proposal under the Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010, are obliged to consider both procedural aspects and the substantive merits of the proposal before determining consent; however, the call-in notices issued remain valid even if the Ministers misunderstood the extent of their powers post-call-in.
Court Disposition
Grounds of Appeal 2 and 3 allowed in part; Lord Ordinary's interlocutors recalled insofar as they grant declarator and reduce call-in notices; cross-grounds of appeal refused; case put out By Order for further procedure.
Orders
- Recall Lord Ordinary's interlocutors of 6 June 2012 insofar as they grant declarator and reduce call-in notices
- Refuse cross-grounds of appeal 2 (Carloway), 3 (Shelibost), and 4 (Shawbost)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment