Aberdeen City Council for Judicial Review [2002] ScotCS 120 (26th April, 2002)

Aberdeen City Council for Judicial Review [2002] ScotCS 120 (26th April, 2002)

Sections 28E(1) and 28F(5) of the Education (Scotland) Act 1980 must be construed as including refusals under section 28A(3A) as grounds for confirming an education authority's decision, as the omission was a clear drafting error. The sheriff erred in law by not interpreting the statute accordingly.

Citation
[2002] ScotCS 120
Parties
Petitioner: Aberdeen City Council; Interested Party: Mrs C. Wakoma
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Outer House, Court of Session, Opinion on Petition for Judicial Review of Sheriff's Interlocutor
Outcome
Petition granted. Sheriff's interlocutor reduced. Declarator granted that section 28F is to be read as including section 28A(3A).
Legal Topics
School Placing Requests, Appeals Process, Statutory Construction, Judicial Review, Fettering of Discretion

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Aberdeen City Council

Petitioner

Mrs C. Wakoma

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Outer House, Court of Session, Opinion on Petition for Judicial Review of Sheriff's Interlocutor

  1. 1 Whether section 28F(5) of the Education (Scotland) Act 1980 should be read as including refusals under section 28A(3A) as grounds for confirming an education authority's decision
  2. 2 Whether the sheriff erred in law in refusing to interpret section 28F(5) to include section 28A(3A)
  3. 3 Whether the petitioners' policy for determining priority of placing requests unlawfully fettered discretion

Ratio Decidendi

Sections 28E(1) and 28F(5) of the Education (Scotland) Act 1980 must be construed as including refusals under section 28A(3A) as grounds for confirming an education authority's decision, as the omission was a clear drafting error. The sheriff erred in law by not interpreting the statute accordingly.

Court Disposition

Petition granted. Sheriff's interlocutor reduced. Declarator granted that section 28F is to be read as including section 28A(3A).

Orders

  • Reduction of the sheriff's interlocutor of 24 December 2001
  • Declarator that section 28F of the Education (Scotland) Act 1980 is to be read as containing a reference to section 28A(3A)