Brightcrew Ltd v The City of Glasgow Licensing Board [2011] ScotCS CSIH_46 (12 July 2011)
The licensing board erred in law by refusing the premises licence based on breaches of a non-statutory code of practice unrelated to the sale of alcohol. The licensing objectives in the 2005 Act must be applied in the context of alcohol licensing, and the Board's approach was a misuse of its statutory powers.
- Citation
- [2011] ScotCS CSIH_46
- Parties
- Pursuers and Appellants: Brightcrew Limited; Defenders and Respondents: The City of Glasgow Licensing Board
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Under Licensing (scotland) Act 2005, S.132(6) / Appeal From Sheriff to Court of Session (inner House, Extra Division)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Scope of Licensing Board Powers, Statutory Interpretation, Licensing Objectives, Adult Entertainment Regulation, Alcohol Licensing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brightcrew Limited
Pursuers and Appellants
The City of Glasgow Licensing Board
Defenders and Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under Licensing (scotland) Act 2005, S.132(6) / Appeal From Sheriff to Court of Session (inner House, Extra Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a licensing board can refuse a premises licence based on breaches of a non-statutory code of practice unrelated to the sale of alcohol
- 2 Proper scope of licensing objectives under the Licensing (Scotland) Act 2005
Ratio Decidendi
The licensing board erred in law by refusing the premises licence based on breaches of a non-statutory code of practice unrelated to the sale of alcohol. The licensing objectives in the 2005 Act must be applied in the context of alcohol licensing, and the Board's approach was a misuse of its statutory powers.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Interlocutor of the sheriff recalled
- First question in the stated case answered in the positive
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment