GRANTON CENTRAL DEVELOPMENTS LTD AGAINST CITY OF EDINBURGH COUNCIL [2021] ScotCS CSOH_29 (19 March 2021)

GRANTON CENTRAL DEVELOPMENTS LTD AGAINST CITY OF EDINBURGH COUNCIL [2021] ScotCS CSOH_29 (19 March 2021)

Clause 5.4 of the Agreement is contingent on a voluntary conveyance of the TLR to the Council under clause 5.2. It does not apply where the Council acquires the TLR by compulsory purchase (GVD). The pursuer's construction of clause 5.4 is irrelevant and unsustainable in law.

Citation
[2021] ScotCS CSOH_29
Parties
Pursuer: Granton Central Developments Limited; Defender: City of Edinburgh Council
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
19 March 2021
Procedural Posture
Commercial Action (contractual Dispute) / Debate on Relevancy (contract Interpretation Issue)
Outcome
Action dismissed (pursuer's case irrelevant)
Legal Topics
Section 75 Agreements, Interpretation of Contractual Clauses, Compulsory Purchase and Vesting Declarations, Planning Obligations, Crichel Down Rules
Planning Law Contract Law Property Law Compulsory Purchase Section 75 Agreements Interpretation of Contractual Clauses Compulsory Purchase and Vesting Declarations Planning Obligations +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Granton Central Developments Limited

Pursuer

City of Edinburgh Council

Defender

Procedural Posture

Commercial Action (contractual Dispute) / Debate on Relevancy (contract Interpretation Issue)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether clause 5.4 of the Agreement imposes an obligation on the Council to reconvey the tram line route (TLR) to the pursuer regardless of how the Council acquired title to the TLR
  2. 2 Whether clause 5.4 is a free-standing obligation or contingent on a conveyance under clause 5.2
  3. 3 Whether the pursuer's construction of clause 5.4 is relevant

Ratio Decidendi

Clause 5.4 of the Agreement is contingent on a voluntary conveyance of the TLR to the Council under clause 5.2. It does not apply where the Council acquires the TLR by compulsory purchase (GVD). The pursuer's construction of clause 5.4 is irrelevant and unsustainable in law.

Court Disposition

Action dismissed (pursuer's case irrelevant)

Orders

  • Defender's second plea in law sustained
  • Pursuer's action dismissed