Ewing v Times Newspapers Ltd [2008] ScotCS CSOH_169 (11 December 2008)
Exceptional circumstances exist justifying an order for caution: the pursuer is impecunious, has a history of vexatious litigation and non-payment of costs, and the claim is of doubtful merit and limited value. Ordering caution in the sum of £15,000 is proportionate and does not contravene Article 6 ECHR.
- Citation
- [2008] ScotCS CSOH_169
- Parties
- Pursuer: Terence Patrick Ewing; Defender: Times Newspapers Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (delict/defamation) / Interlocutory (motion for Caution/security for Expenses)
- Outcome
- Order for caution granted
- Legal Topics
- Security for Expenses (caution), Access to Justice, Article 6 ECHR, Defamation, Qualified Privilege, Impecuniosity, Vexatious Litigation, Damages, Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Terence Patrick Ewing
Pursuer
Times Newspapers Limited
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil (delict/defamation) / Interlocutory (motion for Caution/security for Expenses)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuer should be ordered to find caution (security for expenses) as a condition precedent to continuing the action
- 2 Whether such an order would contravene Article 6 ECHR (right of access to court)
- 3 Whether the pursuer's claim has sufficient merit to avoid caution
Ratio Decidendi
Exceptional circumstances exist justifying an order for caution: the pursuer is impecunious, has a history of vexatious litigation and non-payment of costs, and the claim is of doubtful merit and limited value. Ordering caution in the sum of £15,000 is proportionate and does not contravene Article 6 ECHR.
Court Disposition
Order for caution granted
Orders
- Pursuer to lodge caution (security for expenses) in the sum of £15,000 within four weeks as a condition precedent to proceeding further with the action.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment