Rennet v. Mathieson [1903] ScotLR 40_421 (04 March 1903)
The transaction was a loan secured over moveables, not a genuine sale; as no delivery was made to Mathieson, property in the plant remained with Bisset & Wyllie and passed to the trustee under the trust-deed.
- Citation
- [1903] ScotLR 40_421
- Parties
- Pursuer/respondent/trustee: Ernest Rennet; Defender/appellant/landlord: John Mathieson; Original Debtors/tenants: James Bisset and Alexander Bisset (Bisset & Son, formerly Bisset & Wyllie)
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 04 March 1903
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment by Court of Session Inner House Second Division
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; interlocutor appealed against affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Security Over Moveables, Sale Vs Security, Trust Deed for Creditors, Delivery of Goods, Sale of Goods Act 1893
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ernest Rennet
Pursuer/respondent/trustee
John Mathieson
Defender/appellant/landlord
James Bisset and Alexander Bisset (Bisset & Son, formerly Bisset & Wyllie)
Original Debtors/tenants
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment by Court of Session Inner House Second Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the transaction between Bisset & Wyllie and Mathieson was a genuine sale or a loan secured over moveables
- 2 Whether property in the plant passed to Mathieson or remained with Bisset & Wyllie and their trustee
- 3 Validity of security over moveables without delivery
Ratio Decidendi
The transaction was a loan secured over moveables, not a genuine sale; as no delivery was made to Mathieson, property in the plant remained with Bisset & Wyllie and passed to the trustee under the trust-deed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; interlocutor appealed against affirmed.
Orders
- Refuse prayer of petition as regards gas-engine; declare respondent trustee owner of plant and machinery (excluding gas-engine); grant interdict against defender interfering with possession; award expenses to respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment