Smeaton v. Smeaton [1900] ScotLR 37_595 (20 March 1900)
The evidence of cruelty, both as to the incidents after resumption of cohabitation and when viewed in light of prior incidents, was insufficient to establish that the wife could not safely live with her husband. The pursuer's evidence was exaggerated and uncorroborated. The incidents did not amount to legal cruelty justifying judicial separation.
- Citation
- [1900] ScotLR 37_595
- Parties
- Pursuer: Elizabeth Margaret Smeaton or Smeaton; Defender: Thomas Wright Burgh Smeaton
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 1900
- Procedural Posture
- Action of Separation and Aliment / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Decree of Absolvitor
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; decree of absolvitor adhered to.
- Legal Topics
- Separation, Aliment, Cruelty, Condonation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Elizabeth Margaret Smeaton or Smeaton
Pursuer
Thomas Wright Burgh Smeaton
Defender
Procedural Posture
Action of Separation and Aliment / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Decree of Absolvitor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether acts of cruelty prior to a previous action, which were condoned by resumption of cohabitation, can be considered in a subsequent action for separation on the ground of cruelty; Whether the evidence establishes cruelty sufficient to entitle the wife to judicial separation
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence of cruelty, both as to the incidents after resumption of cohabitation and when viewed in light of prior incidents, was insufficient to establish that the wife could not safely live with her husband. The pursuer's evidence was exaggerated and uncorroborated. The incidents did not amount to legal cruelty justifying judicial separation.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; decree of absolvitor adhered to.
Orders
- Decree of absolvitor for the defender; pursuer found entitled to expenses.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment