Murray v. Petitioner [1906] ScotLR 43_686 (23 June 1906)
A clerical error in the date of the first deliverance in the Edinburgh Gazette notice does not invalidate the sequestration process, and the Court may authorise correction by further notice, enabling the Sheriff to confirm the election of trustee and commissioner as if the original notice had been correct.
- Citation
- [1906] ScotLR 43_686
- Parties
- Petitioner: Alfred Alexander Murray; Debtor: Charles Oscar Northwood
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 1906
- Procedural Posture
- Petition (bankruptcy/sequestration) / Application to Nobile Officium Following Clerical Error in Gazette Notice
- Outcome
- Petition granted as amended
- Legal Topics
- Sequestration, Clerical Error, Gazette Notice, Nobile Officium
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alfred Alexander Murray
Petitioner
Charles Oscar Northwood
Debtor
Procedural Posture
Petition (bankruptcy/sequestration) / Application to Nobile Officium Following Clerical Error in Gazette Notice
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court can authorise correction of a clerical error in a statutory Gazette notice under the Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 1856 via its nobile officium
- 2 Whether the error in the date of the first deliverance in the Edinburgh Gazette invalidates subsequent sequestration proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
A clerical error in the date of the first deliverance in the Edinburgh Gazette notice does not invalidate the sequestration process, and the Court may authorise correction by further notice, enabling the Sheriff to confirm the election of trustee and commissioner as if the original notice had been correct.
Court Disposition
Petition granted as amended
Orders
- Petitioner authorised to insert corrective notice in the Edinburgh Gazette within four days
- Sheriff authorised, upon proof of such notice, to confirm election of trustee and commissioner and proceed as if the original notice had been correct
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment