Watson v. [2004] ScotSC 18 (09 March 2004)
The petition is correctly brought by the petitioner alone, as the law to be applied is that prior to the 1964 Act, and the administrative continuity of the trust requires service of a single heir of provision in trust, not all intestate heirs.
- Citation
- [2004] ScotSC 18
- Parties
- Petitioner: Duncan Watson
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 09 March 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Petition Under Section 6 of the Law Reform (miscellaneous Provisions) (scotland) Act 1980 / Judgment After Hearing on Sufficiency of Proof and Legal Entitlement
- Outcome
- Petition granted
- Legal Topics
- Service of Heir of Provision in Trust, Interpretation of 'heir' Under Trust Law, Effect of Succession (scotland) Act 1964 on Trust Administration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Duncan Watson
Petitioner
Procedural Posture
Petition Under Section 6 of the Law Reform (miscellaneous Provisions) (scotland) Act 1980 / Judgment After Hearing on Sufficiency of Proof and Legal Entitlement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the identity of the 'heir' of the last surviving trustee for the purposes of section 6 of the 1980 Act is to be ascertained by reference to the law of succession before or after the Succession (Scotland) Act 1964
- 2 Whether the petition should be brought by the petitioner alone or by all children as heirs
Ratio Decidendi
The petition is correctly brought by the petitioner alone, as the law to be applied is that prior to the 1964 Act, and the administrative continuity of the trust requires service of a single heir of provision in trust, not all intestate heirs.
Court Disposition
Petition granted
Orders
- Accepts as sufficient proof the affidavits and documents submitted
- Finds the facts stated in the petition proved
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment