Society of Proprietors of Royal Exchange Buildings, Glasgow, Ltd v. Cotton [1912] ScotLR 945 (09 July 1912)
Owners of the dominant tenement ex adverso to the servient property have title and sufficient interest to enforce the servitude non altius tollendi; averment of special damage or injury is not required where the servitude is for the mutual benefit of the properties and the dominant tenement is directly opposite the servient tenement.
- Citation
- [1912] ScotLR 945
- Parties
- Petitioner: Society of Proprietors of Royal Exchange Buildings, Glasgow, Limited; Objectors/appellants: Miss Mary Smythe Cotton and Miss Eliza Cotton
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 09 July 1912
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Inner House, First Division, Post Dean of Guild Interlocutor
- Outcome
- Appeal sustained; Dean of Guild's interlocutor recalled.
- Legal Topics
- Servitude, Real Burden, Non Altius Tollendi, Title to Enforce, Interest to Enforce Servitude
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Society of Proprietors of Royal Exchange Buildings, Glasgow, Limited
Petitioner
Miss Mary Smythe Cotton and Miss Eliza Cotton
Objectors/appellants
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Inner House, First Division, Post Dean of Guild Interlocutor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether objectors have title and interest to enforce servitude non altius tollendi against petitioners' proposed building alterations
- 2 Whether averment of special damage or injury is necessary to enforce servitude or real burden
Ratio Decidendi
Owners of the dominant tenement ex adverso to the servient property have title and sufficient interest to enforce the servitude non altius tollendi; averment of special damage or injury is not required where the servitude is for the mutual benefit of the properties and the dominant tenement is directly opposite the servient tenement.
Court Disposition
Appeal sustained; Dean of Guild's interlocutor recalled.
Orders
- Remit to Dean of Guild to sustain appellants' objections and refuse the petition.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment