STEPHEN HOUSE QPM, CHIEF CONSTABLE OF THE POLICE SERVICE OF SCOTLAND v. D.J.R. + D.D.S. [2013] ScotSC 78 (08 October 2013)

STEPHEN HOUSE QPM, CHIEF CONSTABLE OF THE POLICE SERVICE OF SCOTLAND v. D.J.R. + D.D.S. [2013] ScotSC 78 (08 October 2013)

The court held that the Sexual Offences Act 2003, as modified for Scotland, does not require a separate summary application for each continuation or renewal of an interim SOPO. Continuations of interim SOPOs are competent as ancillary orders within the main application process, provided each period is fixed. The appellant's interpretation would create unnecessary multiplicity and complexity, contrary to the purpose of summary application procedure and the interests of justice.

Citation
[2013] ScotSC 78
Parties
Pursuer and Appellant: Stephen House QPM, Chief Constable of the Police Service of Scotland; Defender and First Respondent: D. J. R.; Defender and Second Respondent: D. D. S.
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
08 October 2013
Procedural Posture
Appeal in Summary Application / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeals refused
Legal Topics
Sexual Offences Prevention Orders, Interim Orders, Summary Application Procedure, Statutory Interpretation
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Sexual Offences Prevention Orders Interim Orders Summary Application Procedure Statutory Interpretation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stephen House QPM, Chief Constable of the Police Service of Scotland

Pursuer and Appellant

D. J. R.

Defender and First Respondent

D. D. S.

Defender and Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal in Summary Application / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the continuation or renewal of interim Sexual Offences Prevention Orders (SOPOs) requires a separate summary application under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 as modified for Scotland.
  2. 2 Whether the sheriff's continuation of interim SOPOs in the main application process was competent.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the Sexual Offences Act 2003, as modified for Scotland, does not require a separate summary application for each continuation or renewal of an interim SOPO. Continuations of interim SOPOs are competent as ancillary orders within the main application process, provided each period is fixed. The appellant's interpretation would create unnecessary multiplicity and complexity, contrary to the purpose of summary application procedure and the interests of justice.

Court Disposition

Appeals refused

Orders

  • Appeals refused and sheriff's interlocutors of 27 June 2013 adhered to.
  • Parties appointed to be heard on the question of expenses of the appeal procedure.