IN APPEAL BY THE CHIEF CONSTABLE OF THE POLICE SERVICE OF SCOTLAND v. DJR AND DDS [2014] ScotCS CSIH_8 (17 January 2014)
Renewal or continuation of interim SOPOs does not require a separate summary application if the process is subsisting in the relevant sheriffdom; applications may be made by motion within the original process, provided fair notice is given and procedural requirements are met.
- Citation
- [2014] ScotCS CSIH_8
- Parties
- Pursuer and Appellant: Chief Constable of the Police Service of Scotland; Defender and Respondent: DJR; Defender and Respondent: DDS
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Principal
- Outcome
- appeals refused
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences Prevention Orders, Interim Orders, Summary Application Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chief Constable of the Police Service of Scotland
Pursuer and Appellant
DJR
Defender and Respondent
DDS
Defender and Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Principal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether renewal or continuation of interim Sexual Offences Prevention Orders (SOPOs) requires a separate summary application or can be made by motion in the original process
- 2 Interpretation of section 112(1)(f) of the Sexual Offences Act 2003
Ratio Decidendi
Renewal or continuation of interim SOPOs does not require a separate summary application if the process is subsisting in the relevant sheriffdom; applications may be made by motion within the original process, provided fair notice is given and procedural requirements are met.
Court Disposition
appeals refused
Orders
- No separate summary application required for renewal or continuation of interim SOPOs within the same sheriffdom.
- Interim SOPOs must specify fixed periods and expiry dates.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment